Source/media access
Waiting for the analyzer to confirm source and media access.
Pending
PendingAI video evidence
Use AI Video Detector as a first-pass video deepfake detection tool. Check public social links or upload a video you have rights to analyze, then review likelihood-based signals, confidence, and limitations.
AI video check
Link access is best-effort. Original uploads receive the strongest evidence scan.
Best-effort for supported public social video URLs. If public media is unavailable, upload the original video for deeper analysis.
By clicking Check video link, you confirm you have the right to submit this video link for analysis and understand results are likelihood-based, not proof.
Estimated credits depend on video size and duration. Detected platform: Unknown.
Live analysis process
See what is happening at each stage. Scores appear only for areas that can be checked.
Check progress
Step 0 of 6Paste a public video link or upload a video you have the right to analyze. We show what can be checked, what may be limited, and how to read the result.
Ready when you are · stage-based progress
Check progress
Each stage shows its current status. Timing depends on video access and plan limits.
Checking input
Validate the URL, file, consent, and supported video source.
35% · Running
Checking access
Run security checks and see what media can be reached safely.
0% · Pending
Preparing video
Get the available video ready for review.
0% · Pending
Waiting to start
Wait for the check to begin. Paid plans start sooner during busy periods.
0% · Pending
Reviewing evidence
Review picture quality, movement, source details, and sound when available.
0% · Pending
Building report
Assemble likelihood, confidence, limitations, and recommendations.
0% · Pending
Signal checks
While the check runs, this panel shows progress only. The completed result appears below.
Source/media access
Waiting for the analyzer to confirm source and media access.
Pending
PendingVisual clues
A score appears after enough of the picture can be reviewed.
Pending
PendingMovement consistency
A score appears after changes over time can be reviewed.
Pending
PendingPicture quality clues
A score appears after the video quality can be reviewed.
Pending
PendingSound and picture consistency
A score appears when both sound and video are available.
Pending
PendingSource details
Available information about the video and its source will appear here.
Pending
PendingVideo deepfake detection is the process of checking whether a video may contain synthetic, swapped, edited, or manipulated signals. A deepfake can change or imitate a person’s face, voice, movement, or actions in a way that may mislead viewers.
Not every AI-generated video is a deepfake. A stylized animation, synthetic product clip, or AI-made creative video can be generated by AI without pretending to show a real person doing something. This page focuses on deepfake and video manipulation signals that deserve closer review before you trust or share a clip.
A deepfake video detector should not rely on a single yes-or-no label. AI Video Detector reviews available signals and explains what was checked, what looked suspicious, and what could not be checked.
Start with a public social video link when that is where you found the clip. Public links can be useful for quick screening, but platform access is not assured. Private, deleted, restricted, login-only, region-limited, or unavailable videos may return a limited report or fail safely.
Upload the original video file when you have the right to analyze it and need a stronger review. Uploads usually give the scanner clearer frame, motion, duration, and audio signals than a restricted public link.
The evidence report is designed to explain the result, not replace your judgment. Start with the result state, then read AI likelihood, confidence, suspicious signals, unchecked signals, and recommended next steps.
Use automated video manipulation detection as one input, not the final answer. If a video could affect a person, a news claim, a financial decision, or public safety, slow down and verify it with other evidence.
If a short social clip appears to show a public figure saying something surprising, begin with the public link and read the result state, confidence, and limitations. A restricted or heavily compressed link may only support a limited result, which means you should look for the original full-length source rather than treating the score as an answer.
If you obtain the original file lawfully, an upload can add clearer frame, motion, duration, and readable-audio evidence. Then compare the report with source provenance, independent coverage, and the broader context before you share, quote, or report the clip.
AI video detection can be wrong. A real video can look unusual after compression, editing, cropping, or reuploading. A manipulated video can contain real footage. A short clip may not include enough evidence for a confident result.
A detector score is not legal proof. A high AI likelihood does not prove a person acted deceptively. A low AI likelihood does not prove the video is real. Use the report as a cautious first-pass signal and combine it with source checking, context review, and human judgment.
Related checks and guides
Start with a public social video URL and see whether the scanner can safely review it.
Check link workflow →Learn how likelihood, confidence, suspicious signals, and unchecked signals should be read together.
Read report guide →See how link, upload, visual, motion, audio, and source signals fit into a cautious first-pass review.
Learn the workflow →Paste a public link or upload a video you have the right to analyze.
Check a video →FAQ
It can run a first-pass check on supported public social video links when enough media or source signals are accessible. Some YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, or X links may return limited results or ask for upload because platform access can be restricted.
Deepfake detection focuses on manipulated or synthetic media that may imitate a real person or event. AI video detection is broader and can include fully AI-generated, edited, synthetic, or manipulated video signals.
No. A detector can show likelihood, confidence, suspicious signals, and limitations, but it cannot prove that a video is fake or real. Treat the result as a screening aid, not a final verdict.
Depending on the input, the report may review visual clues, motion changes, audio-video consistency, source/media access, compression, and unchecked signals. The exact signals depend on what the link or upload makes available.
A public page may still restrict direct media access, require login, be region-limited, be deleted, or provide only partial information. When that happens, the report should say what could not be checked instead of showing a misleading score.
Start with the link if it is public and supported. Upload the original video file when you have rights to analyze it and need a stronger frame, motion, duration, or audio review.
Find the original source, compare other uploads, check account history, look for independent reporting, review context, and ask a human reviewer when the result could affect a person’s reputation, safety, or money.
No. Do not use an automated report alone for legal claims, public accusations, harassment, shaming, or identity verification. Use it as one first-pass signal and seek qualified review for serious decisions.