AI Video Detector logo AI Video Detector

AI video evidence

Understand Your AI Video Evidence Report

Learn how to read AI likelihood, confidence, suspicious signals, unchecked signals, and limitations before you act on a result.

Important: Reports are likelihood-based screening aids. They are not proof that a video is real or fake.

Sample full video report

Full video scan

AI likelihood: elevated; review recommended

A full scan keeps the score, confidence, signals, limitations, and next steps visually separated so the report is easier to read.

Free reports include a basic audio technical check when audio is readable. Paid reports add bounded audio-motion consistency windows for a deeper evidence review.

AI likelihood

62/100

Checked signals suggest possible AI generation or manipulation.

Confidence

Medium

Based on media access and signal quality.

Timeline highlights

00:04–00:11 · face-edge texture inconsistency

00:12–00:18 · hand motion flicker

00:21–00:28 · compression lowers reliability

Recommendation: compare with the original source and request human review before acting on the result.
Show checked, limited, and not checked signals

Source and media details

Duration, size, and source context were reviewed when available.

Checked

Sampled visual evidence

Visual signals such as faces, hands, edges, texture, and compression artifacts.

Checked

Motion consistency

Temporal flicker, warping, repeated movement, and scene-to-scene consistency.

Checked

Audio-video consistency

Basic audio technical checks run when readable audio is available; paid reports add bounded audio-motion timing windows.

Limited

Platform-private context

Private analytics, account ownership, and platform-internal labels are not available.

Not checked

Sample limited link report

Limited link scan

Original media was not accessible from this link

When a public link cannot expose enough video media, the page shows a limited report and pushes upload as the next best action.

AI likelihood

Not enough media

No numeric score when video media is unavailable.

Confidence

Low

Frame, motion, and audio/video signals were not checked.

Why limited: timeline unavailable; sampled frames unavailable; platform restrictions or login walls may prevent media access from the public link.
Upload original video for deeper analysis
Show limited-link signal details

Public link/source signals

The public URL shape, platform, and accessible source details were reviewed.

Checked

Media resolver attempt

The public link did not provide enough accessible media for a full video scan.

Limited

Sampled visual evidence

No original visual evidence was available from this link in the scan.

Not checked

Motion and timeline analysis

Timeline sections require accessible video media or an uploaded original file.

Not checked

Audio-video consistency

Audio-video consistency cannot be checked without readable audio and accessible media.

Not checked

A good report should explain itself

A simple “AI” or “not AI” label is not enough. Social videos are messy. They may be edited, compressed, reposted, cropped, or partly synthetic.

An AI Video Detector report is designed to show the evidence behind the result, not just a single score.

What the report includes

  • AI likelihood: how strongly checked signals suggest AI generation or manipulation.
  • Confidence level: how reliable this specific check is.
  • Result state: likely AI-generated or manipulated, uncertain, no strong AI signals detected, or unsupported.
  • Signal summary: suspicious face, hand, background, motion, audio, or source clues.
  • Unchecked signals: missing audio, low quality, short duration, or limited access.
  • Recommended next steps: check the original source, compare other uploads, avoid accusations, or request expert review.

Score vs confidence

AI likelihood and confidence are different. A video can have a high AI likelihood but low confidence if the clip is short, blurry, or heavily compressed. A video can have a low AI likelihood but still not be proven real.

Use both numbers together. If confidence is low, treat the result as inconclusive.

FAQ

Questions this page answers

Why does the report separate likelihood and confidence?

Likelihood describes the strength of checked signals; confidence describes how reliable this scan is based on media quality and available evidence.

What should I read first in a report?

Start with result state, confidence, and limitations before reading suspicious signals.

Why can a report show unchecked signals?

Some inputs lack enough frames, audio, duration, or source access. The report lists those gaps instead of hiding them.